Andrew Stiles takes a look at the creative legal reasoning the Obama administration used to justify ignoring the plain meaning of the law and go ahead with the ill-fated Solyndra loan.
Andrew Stiles takes a look at the creative legal reasoning the Obama administration used to justify ignoring the plain meaning of the law and go ahead with the ill-fated Solyndra loan.
This entry was posted on Friday, October 28th, 2011 at 9:50 am and is filed under Legal, Political. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.