David Hardy says that the White House’s plan to collect reports of dissident activity is illegal, assuming records are kept.
(Via Instapundit.) (Previous post.)
UPDATE: More:
The White House strategy of turning supporters into snitches when they see “fishy” information about the health care debate may run afoul of the law, legal experts say.
“The White House is in bit of a conundrum because of this privacy statute that prohibits the White House from collecting data and storing it on people who disagree with it,” Judge Andrew Napolitano, a FOX News analyst, said Friday.
“There’s also a statute that requires the White House to retain all communications that it receives. It can’t try to rewrite history by pretending it didn’t receive anything,” he said.
“If the White House deletes anything, it violates one statute. If the White House collects data on the free speech, it violates another statute.”
It would seem that the only way to follow the law would be not to ask for the information in the first place.
Internet Scofflaw 