NYT science columnist John Tierney notes that the prediction markets did much better at predicting the election than any pundit. (Via Instapundit.) It’s a good reminder that free markets aggregate information better than just about anything.
NYT science columnist John Tierney notes that the prediction markets did much better at predicting the election than any pundit. (Via Instapundit.) It’s a good reminder that free markets aggregate information better than just about anything.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 26th, 2008 at 12:30 am and is filed under Political, Scientific. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.