<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Internet Scofflaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internetscofflaw.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internetscofflaw.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on politics, computer science, philosophy, the media, and whatever else strikes my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ACLU opposes religious freedom by K. Crary</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2012/02/08/aclu-opposes-religious-freedom/#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K. Crary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.com/?p=15604#comment-2492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that&#039;s a bit of an overgeneralization. For example, the ACLU opposed McCain-Feingold. But I&#039;ll agree that the ACLU has a strong preference for liberal causes. What galls me about this isn&#039;t that they are taking a pass on freedom of religion (that I would expect), but that they are actively opposing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a bit of an overgeneralization. For example, the ACLU opposed McCain-Feingold. But I&#8217;ll agree that the ACLU has a strong preference for liberal causes. What galls me about this isn&#8217;t that they are taking a pass on freedom of religion (that I would expect), but that they are actively opposing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ACLU opposes religious freedom by Bob Wood</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2012/02/08/aclu-opposes-religious-freedom/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.com/?p=15604#comment-2448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ACLU will only defend causes that are ideologically liberal. There is no room for conservative causes or freedom of religion from state control with the ACLU.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ACLU will only defend causes that are ideologically liberal. There is no room for conservative causes or freedom of religion from state control with the ACLU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Right abandons SOPA/PIPA, left doesn&#8217;t by K. Crary</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2012/01/19/right-abandons-sopapipa-left-doesnt/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K. Crary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.com/?p=15509#comment-2078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you figure? Of the 31 co-sponsors, 15 were Republicans: Amodei, Blackburn, Carter, Chabot, Gallegly, Goodlatte, Griffin (withdrawn), King, Mack, Marino, Nunnelee, Ross (withdrawn), Scalese, Terry (withdrawn), Quayle (withdrawn); and 16 were Democrats: Baca, Barrow, Bass, Berman, Chu, Conyers, Cooper, Deutch, Holden, Larson, Lujan, Owens, Schiff, Sherman, Wasserman-Schultz, Watt. Throw in Lamar Smith and it&#039;s exactly even: 16 Republicans, 16 Democrats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you figure? Of the 31 co-sponsors, 15 were Republicans: Amodei, Blackburn, Carter, Chabot, Gallegly, Goodlatte, Griffin (withdrawn), King, Mack, Marino, Nunnelee, Ross (withdrawn), Scalese, Terry (withdrawn), Quayle (withdrawn); and 16 were Democrats: Baca, Barrow, Bass, Berman, Chu, Conyers, Cooper, Deutch, Holden, Larson, Lujan, Owens, Schiff, Sherman, Wasserman-Schultz, Watt. Throw in Lamar Smith and it&#8217;s exactly even: 16 Republicans, 16 Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Right abandons SOPA/PIPA, left doesn&#8217;t by malawigin</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2012/01/19/right-abandons-sopapipa-left-doesnt/#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[malawigin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.com/?p=15509#comment-2062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, the Republicans have many more people to actually back away from it.  From the debates:

Paul touted his long-standing opposition to the law. &quot;I am pleased that the attitude has sort of mellowed up here, because the Republicans unfortunately have been on the wrong side of this issue,&quot; he said. &quot;This bill is not going to pass, but watch out for the next one.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the Republicans have many more people to actually back away from it.  From the debates:</p>
<p>Paul touted his long-standing opposition to the law. &#8220;I am pleased that the attitude has sort of mellowed up here, because the Republicans unfortunately have been on the wrong side of this issue,&#8221; he said. &#8220;This bill is not going to pass, but watch out for the next one.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Love those bureaucrats by K. Crary</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2012/01/13/love-those-bureaucrats/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K. Crary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.wordpress.com/?p=15438#comment-2053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, but migrations are time sensitive. You can&#039;t necessarily undo the damage by allowing it to go forward later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but migrations are time sensitive. You can&#8217;t necessarily undo the damage by allowing it to go forward later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Love those bureaucrats by foxcharlie</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2012/01/13/love-those-bureaucrats/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foxcharlie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.wordpress.com/?p=15438#comment-2048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FAA has backed off. See the first comment in the linked article. (Also seen elsewhere.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FAA has backed off. See the first comment in the linked article. (Also seen elsewhere.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NYT&#8217;s bogus gun-crime figures by Linoge</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2012/01/04/the-nyts-bogus-gun-crime-figures/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linoge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.wordpress.com/?p=15419#comment-2037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the linkage - it definitely puts the argument in perspective, does it not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the linkage &#8211; it definitely puts the argument in perspective, does it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health care union drops coverage for children by Dec 8 &#124; Harnett County GOP</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2010/12/08/health-care-union-drops-coverage-for-children/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dec 8 &#124; Harnett County GOP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.com/?p=12078#comment-2025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Obamcare result: Healthcare Union drops coverage for children. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obamcare result: Healthcare Union drops coverage for children. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Against charity by K. Crary</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2011/11/04/against-charity/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K. Crary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.com/?p=15036#comment-1778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A complete sentence would be more helpful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A complete sentence would be more helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Against charity by Kashish Mishra</title>
		<link>http://internetscofflaw.com/2011/11/04/against-charity/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kashish Mishra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetscofflaw.com/?p=15036#comment-1669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am totally agree with obama. truth is here.In a study released Wednesday, the University of Indiana’s Center on Philanthropy estimates that in 2013—when both higher tax rates and the decreased charitable deduction would take effect.

http://www.diyafoundation.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am totally agree with obama. truth is here.In a study released Wednesday, the University of Indiana’s Center on Philanthropy estimates that in 2013—when both higher tax rates and the decreased charitable deduction would take effect.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.diyafoundation.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.diyafoundation.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

